Managing Your Weight

15 12 2009
This article is about managing your weight…..of your bags!

Quin Cheung at the airport with two fully loaded Urban Disguise briefcases. Photo by Dave Cheung, www.dqstudios.com

This article is about managing your weight…..of your bags!

It is inevitable that if you’re traveling with most professional grade photography equipment you’re going to be over the normal 40 pound/18.14 kilograms carry on requirement of most USA airlines. It’s even worse with most non-USA  carriers as they usually have a much lower carry on weight– as low as 13 pounds/5.90 kilograms. (Need up-to-date help with airline requirements? Seat Guru, www.seatguru.com, is good for checking carry on requirements.  Click on your airline first, and then click on “Baggage” and all the information will come up.)

One Bag or Two?
For justifiable reasons, many sports and other professional photographers like to fit ALL of their equipment into ONE bag, for example, Think Tank’s Airport Security™ roller. Using one bag means that when you unzip it open, everything is tightly organized and in it’s proper place in order to make maximum use of space.

The problem with the “one bag” approach is that it is going to be extremely heavy. For sports photographers carrying a 400 2.8, for example, that means your rolling camera bag is going to be between 45 – 60 pounds/18.14 – 27.22 kilograms.
What many new photographers fail to realize is that it is more common to be challenged at the airport for the weight of their bag, and not the size. Often if you are using a rolling bag or backpack that is the maximum carrying on size, this is a trigger to airline personnel that they should weigh your bag.

Two Bags

I normally recommend to photographers that if the airline has a two bag carry on allowance–meaning one carry on (like a roller or a backpack) and one personal item (like a briefcase)–they should use two smaller bags, which will lower each bag’s weight.

For example, one combination of two smaller bags would be:

1.    Think Tank’s Airport Take Off™ rolling backpack ( www.thinktankphoto.com/products/airport-takeoff-roller-camera-bag.aspx )
2.    An Urban Disguise® photo briefcase ( www.thinktankphoto.com/products/urban-disguise-60-shoulder-computer-bag.aspx )

The Airport Take Off™ will carry your 400 2.8, but probably won’t hold everything you need to shoot sports when you travel. But the advantage of the Airport Take Off™ is that it clearly looks like carry on size, or even under sized. So, you’re less likely to be asked to weigh your bag.

You then you put your laptop into an Urban Disguise® briefcase, along with the other gear you were not able to fit in the Take Off. For example, “overflow” items in your briefcase could be your 70-200, a couple of strobes, all your cords, cables, and batteries, your second camera body, etc.

Using this technique, you now have two bags that clearly meet the carry on size requirement. The disadvantage is that now you have your gear in two separate bags, which is not as convenient when you need to access it at your shooting venue.

Still, the inconvenience of the two bag approach is greatly made up by the reduced chance of being hassled at the airport or having to watch as your valuable and delicate gear is thrown into checked baggage.

Here is another example of a two bag configuration:

1.    Glass Taxi™  ( www.thinktankphoto.com/products/glass-taxi.aspx )  This carries a 300 2.8, 400 2.8, or a 500 4. And, you can probably stuff your AC adaptor, batteries, and some other equipment into it.

2.    Urban Disguise® 60 ( www.thinktankphoto.com/products/urban-disguise-60-shoulder-computer-bag.aspx ) This will carry the follow items:

•    Laptop
•    Two pro size bodies
•    70-200 2.8
•    One other lens like a 16-35 or a 24 -70.

The advantage to this set up is that no one will guess you have a 400 2.8 in the Glass Taxi since it looks so small.  And the rest of your gear will it in the Urban Disguise® briefcase, which ironically enough, will probably weigh more than the Glass Taxi.
The key is to know the airlines’ requirements in advance and to figure out how you can use combinations of bags in order to keep your gear safely near you while flying.





On Supporting Photographers

26 08 2009

I get a lot of phone calls from photographers requesting to be sponsored by Think Tank Photo.  I recently received an unusual email from Canadian photographer Kelvin Young who was volunteering to go to Nairobi, Kenya with the ORBIS Flying Eye Hospital.  (You can read about the flying hospital here).

Photographer Kelvin Young on the ORBIS DC-10 Flying Eye Hospital, with Think Tank gear.

Photographer Kelvin Young on the ORBIS DC-10 Flying Eye Hospital, with Think Tank gear.

I spent some time on Kelvin’s website and also on the ORBIS website and was impressed with ORBIS’ mission and that Kelvin was going to document the event as a photojournalist.

Philosophically, I have always maintained that our mission at Think Tank is more than just supplying bags to photographers. There are many companies that focus solely on the product, and forget about the larger ramifications of what impact their products have on the world.  I have always believed it is vitally important to support photographers, because the images that they create and use to tell stories are absolutely vital.  Our mission is about more.  It is about supporting photographers doing their job.

So the story about the Flying Eye Hospital, a DC-10 aircraft converted into a mobile ophthalmic surgical unit, is really an amazing one.

I am proud of the fact that we could support both ORBIS and Kelvin on their trip to Kenya. You can see some of Kelvin’s photos of the trip on youtube.





Only in Las Vegas

7 06 2009

Normally I’m the one that gets blamed for the crazy ideas and product names at Think Tank Photo, but this new product launch with showgirls has to be given credit to Larry Atil and Brian Erwin. Of course this would only have worked in Las Vegas, otherwise it would not have been so amusing.

Absurdity makes people laugh, and this was absurd.

Immersion_115_df_sm copy

The showgirls strolled into the room and seductively handed out bags to each participant, with feathers, beads, and diamond studded pierced belly buttons. This was quite a surprise for both the coaches and the participants, not expecting anything so outlandish at the beginning of such a “serious” training event.

ONLY IN LAS VEGAS. Anywhere else, this stunt would have fallen flat. But here in the city of glitz, gambling, sin and showgirls, it was a grand introduction for both the NPPA event and for Think Tank Photo.

I believe the reason why this happened is because as a company, we do “think outside of the box.” When we brainstorm, we never eliminate seemingly crazy ideas, concepts, or names, and the benefit is that we end up laughing a lot……except in this case we took the risk and actually executed the crazy idea.
Immersion_070_df_sm copy

The attractive feathery showgirls were great sports…..special thanks to Tara, Lonestar, and Chrystal of Stardust Showgirls (www.stardustshowgirls.com) for making this a  memorable event.

We are proud sponsors of the National Press Photographers Association and the Multimedia Immersion program. Thanks to Jim Straight, Seth Gitner, and Will Sullivan for allowing us to be part of the program and for giving us the opportunity to introduce our new product line Las Vegas style.

You can see more pictures on the Think Tank Photo Facebook page, www.nppa.org, and www.multimediaimmersion.com.





Being There in 3rd Person

29 12 2008

Sometimes as product designers we get this sense of being isolated in our own little world—not being out where things really happen, not really knowing what is going on in the photography world  This feeling is not uncommon.  At one place I worked there was a picture of designers in jail in jump suits, with a caption, “Help designers escape the pen” (penitentiary).  

Robert J Cijntje

Fernando E Motta shooting at the end of runway of Princess Juliana International Airport in St. Maarten. Photo: Robert J Cijntje

 

There is this other nagging feeling that  there is a complete disconnect between the creation of the product and how it is actually used in the real world after it is sold.  In a designer’s dream world, we wish we could trade places with photographers.  Kind of like a designer’s version of the movie Trading Places.

So one of the coolest things is when photographers send us photos using our products around the world. It’s like we are there in the 3rd person, kind of in spirit, since the photographers are using products into which we poured so much of ourselves.  I hope I’m not getting to metaphysical here, but I’m trying to say something that is difficult to put into words: the ineffable realm for designers.

Take this photo from Robert Cijntje of Fernando Motta in St. Maarten. I love this photo because it’s absurd.  Who would have thought such a composition was possible?  A woman in a bikini? A guy with a bald head shooting pictures with a Think Tank modular system on? The beach? The plane landing? And some guy in the background next to a sign that says “danger”?  And yet, I get a sense that I’m there because Fernando is using our belt system.

I’ve received other photos as well, from the Olympics, industrial work sites, Antarctica, photographers in the rain and snow, in hospital rooms…the list goes on and on. I’ve even gotten “in use” product photos with naked people in the photo.

As designers we basically have office jobs.  So when we receive these photos we can vicariously experience the world through our customers’ eyes, understand what kinds of situations our products are used in, and feel a sense of accomplishment that our products are helping photographers take pictures.

Let me try to explain this another way. It seems that photojournalists and photographers in general experience the world in person, going to all sorts of events and participating in the storytelling process. Photographers are there, living that moment. For everyone else, reading it in the paper or on the Internet, it’s just not the same. So maybe we have “photographer’s envy.”  But being there in the 3rd person is not too bad, in the scheme of things. 





Toys or Tools? Photokina afterthoughts.

17 10 2008

 

Throngs of people surge into 11 halls at Photokina.

Throngs of people surge into 11 halls at Photokina.

As the largest Photo trade show in the world, Photokina is really the ultimate toy store for photographers.  Anything you could want to see, feel, or admire is at this show – cameras, printers, memory cards, and all sorts of bizarre stuff as well.

 

Is photography really about collecting toys? Pros view their gear as tools to create images, and when the tool wear out, they replace, or they buy new tools if they provide something new from an imaging perspective, or have a specific advantage over their previous tool.

There is a huge contingent of serious photographers and amateurs that for some reason think photography is about collecting gear, and less about imaging.  We have all met someone with a huge bag of brand new gear, with two pro bodies, and yet either has never used it, or remains in the closest most of the year in a thickly padded bag to protect those precious collectables.

One of my favorite articles related to this issue is a piece by Rob Galbraith on Magnum photographer Alex Majoli using a point and shoot camera in 2005: www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6468-7844   Although all pros normally carry a point a shoot, a professional that only carries a point and shoot camera is unheard of. 

We all know that photography is about “seeing”, capturing emotion, telling stories, etc. but it is so easy to get caught up in the gear and forget about what it is really about. Being in the business of selling gear, we like to remind our customers to NOT put the camera in the camera bag and use it instead for changing lenses, or don’t take a bag at all and just carry the camera with a few modular components on your belt.  Get out and take pictures!  It just seems there are many people spending to much time collecting gear and spending time on the Internet, and not taking pictures.

It’s important for pros to understand though that the market is actually fueled by sales to the serious photographers and amateurs, and without those sales, the incredible DSLR’s that are being offered now would simply not exist.  The sales of cameras to pros are an incredible small fraction compared to sales to non-pros.

I spoke with Bob Carey today about various topics (www.sportsshooter.com/members.html?id=1617) and he asked an important question – Does your gear define who you are a photographer? If you prop a monopod on your shoulder with a 400 2.8 lens, does that make you a sports photographer?

My personal opinion is that there should be more media hype about taking quality images and telling stories to the serious photographers and amateurs, then there is about the gear itself. 

Then again, that new Canon 5D Mark II is pretty damn cool………

 

 





Direct communication with photographers.

31 08 2008

 

Women participate in a survey with Lily Fisher, senior designer and developer with Think Tank Photo, on Friday night, August 8th, during the Women In Photojournalism conference in New Orleans, La.

Women participate in a survey with Lily Fisher, senior designer and developer with Think Tank Photo, on Friday night, August 8th, during the Women In Photojournalism conference in New Orleans, La.

As a product designer, it is interesting to me that most companies do not allow their designers to talk directly to their customers. Designers are very creative, analytical, and intuitive, and there is no substitute for talking directly to the person using the product. Regardless, many companies put other people in the way of this relationship, such as product managers, sales and marketing people, and the like. 

 

I think the simple reason for this is “control.” Companies don’t like for the designers to be in control, or even to give input on what should be strategically developed. 

Sometimes I refer to this as the “Politics of Product,” meaning the internal company politics that occur about which products should be developed and why. For those of you involved in the design, marketing, or sales of any type product, you probably already intuitively understand what “The Politics of Product” actually means. Let me further try to clarify this.

When a product is designed by committee, all sorts of people give input into what they think the product should be, each person representing a special interest. For example, the designer wants some cool features, the sales people want a certain price point, the marketing person wants something else, etc, etc, ad infinitum. The Politics of Product occurs when the grand debate ensues about what the product should be, what features it should have, what it should cost, and more.

My design philosophy is actually the opposite. There are no business people between the designers and the photographers. Designers should  listen directly to what the photographers need and want and make it for them. No politics! 

Using this design strategy is an absolute pleasure – working with photographers directly, the ones out in the field using the equipment, to find out what their needs are, asking them what works and what doesn’t. As a designer, the most satisfying thing is hearing from a photographer that the product exceeded his expectations!





About Think Tank Photo

27 08 2008

 

Think Tank co-founder and photojournalist in Thailand.

Think Tank co-founder and photojournalist Kurt Rogers in Thailand.

We are a group of designers and professional photographers focused on studying how photographers work, and developing inventive new carrying solutions to meet their needs. By focusing on “speed” and “accessibility,” we prepare photographers to Be Ready “Before The Moment,” allowing them to capture those historic moments that reflect their personal visions and artistic talents. For some companies, it is only about the product. For us, it is more: It is about supporting photographers doing their job. If we can design products that help photographers travel easier, take pictures faster, and organize their gear more efficiently, then we will have accomplished something beyond the bags themselves. www.thinktankphoto.com